[c++20] Implement semantic restrictions for C++20 designated

initializers.

This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:

 * We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
   in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
   initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
   is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)

 * The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
   overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
   programs.

 * C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
   the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
   '.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
   It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.

 * All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
   default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
   on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
   by default.

 * In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
   so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
   accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
   by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).

This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.

This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@370544 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td

@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ def GNUComplexInteger : DiagGroup<"gnu-complex-integer">;
 def GNUConditionalOmittedOperand : DiagGroup<"gnu-conditional-omitted-operand">;
 def ConfigMacros : DiagGroup<"config-macros">;
 def : DiagGroup<"ctor-dtor-privacy">;
-def GNUDesignator : DiagGroup<"gnu-designator">;
 def GNUStringLiteralOperatorTemplate :
   DiagGroup<"gnu-string-literal-operator-template">;
 def UndefinedVarTemplate : DiagGroup<"undefined-var-template">;
@@ -146,6 +145,12 @@ def Deprecated : DiagGroup<"deprecated", [DeprecatedAttributes,
                                           DeprecatedWritableStr]>,
                  DiagCategory<"Deprecations">;
 
+def CXX2aDesignator : DiagGroup<"c++20-designator">;
+// Allow -Wno-c99-designator to be used to turn off all warnings on valid C99
+// designators (including the warning controlled by -Wc++20-designator).
+def C99Designator : DiagGroup<"c99-designator", [CXX2aDesignator]>;
+def GNUDesignator : DiagGroup<"gnu-designator">;
+
 def DynamicExceptionSpec
     : DiagGroup<"dynamic-exception-spec", [DeprecatedDynamicExceptionSpec]>;
 
@@ -896,7 +901,7 @@ def CXX17 : DiagGroup<"c++17-extensions">;
 
 // A warning group for warnings about using C++2a features as extensions in
 // earlier C++ versions.
-def CXX2a : DiagGroup<"c++2a-extensions">;
+def CXX2a : DiagGroup<"c++2a-extensions", [CXX2aDesignator]>;
 
 def : DiagGroup<"c++0x-extensions", [CXX11]>;
 def : DiagGroup<"c++1y-extensions", [CXX14]>;
@@ -909,7 +914,7 @@ def DelegatingCtorCycles :
 def C11 : DiagGroup<"c11-extensions">;
 
 // A warning group for warnings about using C99 features as extensions.
-def C99 : DiagGroup<"c99-extensions">;
+def C99 : DiagGroup<"c99-extensions", [C99Designator]>;
 
 // A warning group for warnings about GCC extensions.
 def GNU : DiagGroup<"gnu", [GNUAlignofExpression, GNUAnonymousStruct,

include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td

@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ def err_variably_modified_new_type : Error<
 
 // C99 Designated Initializers
 def ext_designated_init : Extension<
-  "designated initializers are a C99 feature">, InGroup<C99>;
+  "designated initializers are a C99 feature">, InGroup<C99Designator>;
 def err_array_designator_negative : Error<
   "array designator value '%0' is negative">;
 def err_array_designator_empty_range : Error<
@@ -173,15 +173,17 @@ def err_field_designator_nonfield : Error<
 def note_field_designator_found : Note<"field designator refers here">;
 def err_designator_for_scalar_init : Error<
   "designator in initializer for scalar type %0">;
-def warn_subobject_initializer_overrides : Warning<
-  "subobject initialization overrides initialization of other fields "
-  "within its enclosing subobject">, InGroup<InitializerOverrides>;
 def warn_initializer_overrides : Warning<
-  "initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject">,
-  InGroup<InitializerOverrides>;
+  "initializer %select{partially |}0overrides prior initialization of "
+  "this subobject">, InGroup<InitializerOverrides>;
+def ext_initializer_overrides : ExtWarn<warn_initializer_overrides.Text>,
+  InGroup<InitializerOverrides>, SFINAEFailure;
+def err_initializer_overrides_destructed : Error<
+  "initializer would partially override prior initialization of object of "
+  "type %1 with non-trivial destruction">;
 def note_previous_initializer : Note<
   "previous initialization %select{|with side effects }0is here"
-  "%select{| (side effects may not occur at run time)}0">;
+  "%select{| (side effects will not occur at run time)}0">;
 def err_designator_into_flexible_array_member : Error<
   "designator into flexible array member subobject">;
 def note_flexible_array_member : Note<
@@ -189,6 +191,28 @@ def note_flexible_array_member : Note<
 def ext_flexible_array_init : Extension<
   "flexible array initialization is a GNU extension">, InGroup<GNUFlexibleArrayInitializer>;
 
+// C++20 designated initializers
+def ext_cxx_designated_init : Extension<
+  "designated initializers are a C++20 extension">, InGroup<CXX2aDesignator>;
+def warn_cxx17_compat_designated_init : Warning<
+  "designated initializers are incompatible with C++ standards before C++20">,
+  InGroup<CXXPre2aCompatPedantic>, DefaultIgnore;
+def ext_designated_init_mixed : ExtWarn<
+  "mixture of designated and non-designated initializers in the same "
+  "initializer list is a C99 extension">, InGroup<C99Designator>;
+def note_designated_init_mixed : Note<
+  "first non-designated initializer is here">;
+def ext_designated_init_array : ExtWarn<
+  "array designators are a C99 extension">, InGroup<C99Designator>;
+def ext_designated_init_nested : ExtWarn<
+  "nested designators are a C99 extension">, InGroup<C99Designator>;
+def ext_designated_init_reordered : ExtWarn<
+  "ISO C++ requires field designators to be specified in declaration order; "
+  "field %1 will be initialized after field %0">, InGroup<Reorder>,
+  SFINAEFailure;
+def note_previous_field_init : Note<
+  "previous initialization for field %0 is here">;
+
 // Declarations.
 def ext_plain_complex : ExtWarn<
   "plain '_Complex' requires a type specifier; assuming '_Complex double'">;

include/clang/Sema/Sema.h

@@ -2775,6 +2775,9 @@ public:
                                              Expr *Value,
                                              bool AllowNRVO = true);
 
+  bool CanPerformAggregateInitializationForOverloadResolution(
+      const InitializedEntity &Entity, InitListExpr *From);
+
   bool CanPerformCopyInitialization(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
                                     ExprResult Init);
   ExprResult PerformCopyInitialization(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
@@ -4636,6 +4639,10 @@ public:
                            MultiExprArg InitArgList,
                            SourceLocation RBraceLoc);
 
+  ExprResult BuildInitList(SourceLocation LBraceLoc,
+                           MultiExprArg InitArgList,
+                           SourceLocation RBraceLoc);
+
   ExprResult ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Designation &Desig,
                                         SourceLocation Loc,
                                         bool GNUSyntax,

lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp

@@ -6107,6 +6107,77 @@ Sema::BuildCompoundLiteralExpr(SourceLocation LParenLoc, TypeSourceInfo *TInfo,
 ExprResult
 Sema::ActOnInitList(SourceLocation LBraceLoc, MultiExprArg InitArgList,
                     SourceLocation RBraceLoc) {
+  // Only produce each kind of designated initialization diagnostic once.
+  SourceLocation FirstDesignator;
+  bool DiagnosedArrayDesignator = false;
+  bool DiagnosedNestedDesignator = false;
+  bool DiagnosedMixedDesignator = false;
+
+  // Check that any designated initializers are syntactically valid in the
+  // current language mode.
+  for (unsigned I = 0, E = InitArgList.size(); I != E; ++I) {
+    if (auto *DIE = dyn_cast<DesignatedInitExpr>(InitArgList[I])) {
+      if (FirstDesignator.isInvalid())
+        FirstDesignator = DIE->getBeginLoc();
+
+      if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
+        break;
+
+      if (!DiagnosedNestedDesignator && DIE->size() > 1) {
+        DiagnosedNestedDesignator = true;
+        Diag(DIE->getBeginLoc(), diag::ext_designated_init_nested)
+          << DIE->getDesignatorsSourceRange();
+      }
+
+      for (auto &Desig : DIE->designators()) {
+        if (!Desig.isFieldDesignator() && !DiagnosedArrayDesignator) {
+          DiagnosedArrayDesignator = true;
+          Diag(Desig.getBeginLoc(), diag::ext_designated_init_array)
+            << Desig.getSourceRange();
+        }
+      }
+
+      if (!DiagnosedMixedDesignator &&
+          !isa<DesignatedInitExpr>(InitArgList[0])) {
+        DiagnosedMixedDesignator = true;
+        Diag(DIE->getBeginLoc(), diag::ext_designated_init_mixed)
+          << DIE->getSourceRange();
+        Diag(InitArgList[0]->getBeginLoc(), diag::note_designated_init_mixed)
+          << InitArgList[0]->getSourceRange();
+      }
+    } else if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && !DiagnosedMixedDesignator &&
+               isa<DesignatedInitExpr>(InitArgList[0])) {
+      DiagnosedMixedDesignator = true;
+      auto *DIE = cast<DesignatedInitExpr>(InitArgList[0]);
+      Diag(DIE->getBeginLoc(), diag::ext_designated_init_mixed)
+        << DIE->getSourceRange();
+      Diag(InitArgList[I]->getBeginLoc(), diag::note_designated_init_mixed)
+        << InitArgList[I]->getSourceRange();
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (FirstDesignator.isValid()) {
+    // Only diagnose designated initiaization as a C++20 extension if we didn't
+    // already diagnose use of (non-C++20) C99 designator syntax.
+    if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && !DiagnosedArrayDesignator &&
+        !DiagnosedNestedDesignator && !DiagnosedMixedDesignator) {
+      Diag(FirstDesignator, getLangOpts().CPlusPlus2a
+                                ? diag::warn_cxx17_compat_designated_init
+                                : diag::ext_cxx_designated_init);
+    } else if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && !getLangOpts().C99) {
+      Diag(FirstDesignator, diag::ext_designated_init);
+    }
+  }
+
+  return BuildInitList(LBraceLoc, InitArgList, RBraceLoc);
+}
+
+ExprResult
+Sema::BuildInitList(SourceLocation LBraceLoc, MultiExprArg InitArgList,
+                    SourceLocation RBraceLoc) {
+  // Semantic analysis for initializers is done by ActOnDeclarator() and
+  // CheckInitializer() - it requires knowledge of the object being initialized.
+
   // Immediately handle non-overload placeholders.  Overloads can be
   // resolved contextually, but everything else here can't.
   for (unsigned I = 0, E = InitArgList.size(); I != E; ++I) {
@@ -6121,9 +6192,6 @@ Sema::ActOnInitList(SourceLocation LBraceLoc, MultiExprArg InitArgList,
     }
   }
 
-  // Semantic analysis for initializers is done by ActOnDeclarator() and
-  // CheckInitializer() - it requires knowledge of the object being initialized.
-
   InitListExpr *E = new (Context) InitListExpr(Context, LBraceLoc, InitArgList,
                                                RBraceLoc);
   E->setType(Context.VoidTy); // FIXME: just a place holder for now.

lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp

@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ class InitListChecker {
   bool hadError = false;
   bool VerifyOnly; // No diagnostics.
   bool TreatUnavailableAsInvalid; // Used only in VerifyOnly mode.
+  bool InOverloadResolution;
   InitListExpr *FullyStructuredList = nullptr;
   NoInitExpr *DummyExpr = nullptr;
 
@@ -372,6 +373,63 @@ class InitListChecker {
   ExprResult PerformEmptyInit(SourceLocation Loc,
                               const InitializedEntity &Entity);
 
+  /// Diagnose that OldInit (or part thereof) has been overridden by NewInit.
+  void diagnoseInitOverride(Expr *OldInit, SourceRange NewInitRange,
+                            bool FullyOverwritten = true) {
+    // Overriding an initializer via a designator is valid with C99 designated
+    // initializers, but ill-formed with C++20 designated initializers.
+    unsigned DiagID = SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus
+                          ? diag::ext_initializer_overrides
+                          : diag::warn_initializer_overrides;
+
+    if (InOverloadResolution && SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+      // In overload resolution, we have to strictly enforce the rules, and so
+      // don't allow any overriding of prior initializers. This matters for a
+      // case such as:
+      //
+      //   union U { int a, b; };
+      //   struct S { int a, b; };
+      //   void f(U), f(S);
+      //
+      // Here, f({.a = 1, .b = 2}) is required to call the struct overload. For
+      // consistency, we disallow all overriding of prior initializers in
+      // overload resolution, not only overriding of union members.
+      hadError = true;
+    } else if (OldInit->getType().isDestructedType() && !FullyOverwritten) {
+      // If we'll be keeping around the old initializer but overwriting part of
+      // the object it initialized, and that object is not trivially
+      // destructible, this can leak. Don't allow that, not even as an
+      // extension.
+      //
+      // FIXME: It might be reasonable to allow this in cases where the part of
+      // the initializer that we're overriding has trivial destruction.
+      DiagID = diag::err_initializer_overrides_destructed;
+    } else if (!OldInit->getSourceRange().isValid()) {
+      // We need to check on source range validity because the previous
+      // initializer does not have to be an explicit initializer. e.g.,
+      //
+      // struct P { int a, b; };
+      // struct PP { struct P p } l = { { .a = 2 }, .p.b = 3 };
+      //
+      // There is an overwrite taking place because the first braced initializer
+      // list "{ .a = 2 }" already provides value for .p.b (which is zero).
+      //
+      // Such overwrites are harmless, so we don't diagnose them. (Note that in
+      // C++, this cannot be reached unless we've already seen and diagnosed a
+      // different conformance issue, such as a mixture of designated and
+      // non-designated initializers or a multi-level designator.)
+      return;
+    }
+
+    if (!VerifyOnly) {
+      SemaRef.Diag(NewInitRange.getBegin(), DiagID)
+          << NewInitRange << FullyOverwritten << OldInit->getType();
+      SemaRef.Diag(OldInit->getBeginLoc(), diag::note_previous_initializer)
+          << (OldInit->HasSideEffects(SemaRef.Context) && FullyOverwritten)
+          << OldInit->getSourceRange();
+    }
+  }
+
   // Explanation on the "FillWithNoInit" mode:
   //
   // Assume we have the following definitions (Case#1):
@@ -410,9 +468,9 @@ class InitListChecker {
                                SourceLocation Loc);
 
 public:
-  InitListChecker(Sema &S, const InitializedEntity &Entity,
-                  InitListExpr *IL, QualType &T, bool VerifyOnly,
-                  bool TreatUnavailableAsInvalid);
+  InitListChecker(Sema &S, const InitializedEntity &Entity, InitListExpr *IL,
+                  QualType &T, bool VerifyOnly, bool TreatUnavailableAsInvalid,
+                  bool InOverloadResolution = false);
   bool HadError() { return hadError; }
 
   // Retrieves the fully-structured initializer list used for
@@ -877,9 +935,11 @@ static bool hasAnyDesignatedInits(const InitListExpr *IL) {
 
 InitListChecker::InitListChecker(Sema &S, const InitializedEntity &Entity,
                                  InitListExpr *IL, QualType &T, bool VerifyOnly,
-                                 bool TreatUnavailableAsInvalid)
+                                 bool TreatUnavailableAsInvalid,
+                                 bool InOverloadResolution)
     : SemaRef(S), VerifyOnly(VerifyOnly),
-      TreatUnavailableAsInvalid(TreatUnavailableAsInvalid) {
+      TreatUnavailableAsInvalid(TreatUnavailableAsInvalid),
+      InOverloadResolution(InOverloadResolution) {
   if (!VerifyOnly || hasAnyDesignatedInits(IL)) {
     FullyStructuredList =
         createInitListExpr(T, IL->getSourceRange(), IL->getNumInits());
@@ -1959,7 +2019,8 @@ void InitListChecker::CheckStructUnionTypes(
       }
 
     // If there's a default initializer, use it.
-    if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(RD) && cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RD)->hasInClassInitializer()) {
+    if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(RD) &&
+        cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RD)->hasInClassInitializer()) {
       if (!StructuredList)
         return;
       for (RecordDecl::field_iterator FieldEnd = RD->field_end();
@@ -2276,7 +2337,9 @@ class FieldInitializerValidatorCCC final : public CorrectionCandidateCallback {
 ///
 /// @param NextField  If non-NULL and the first designator in @p DIE is
 /// a field, this will be set to the field declaration corresponding
-/// to the field named by the designator.
+/// to the field named by the designator. On input, this is expected to be
+/// the next field that would be initialized in the absence of designation,
+/// if the complete object being initialized is a struct.
 ///
 /// @param NextElementIndex  If non-NULL and the first designator in @p
 /// DIE is an array designator or GNU array-range designator, this
@@ -2344,53 +2407,41 @@ InitListChecker::CheckDesignatedInitializer(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
             SourceRange(D->getBeginLoc(), DIE->getEndLoc()));
       else if (InitListExpr *Result = dyn_cast<InitListExpr>(ExistingInit))
         StructuredList = Result;
-      else if (!VerifyOnly) {
-        if (DesignatedInitUpdateExpr *E =
-                dyn_cast<DesignatedInitUpdateExpr>(ExistingInit))
-          StructuredList = E->getUpdater();
-        else {
-          DesignatedInitUpdateExpr *DIUE = new (SemaRef.Context)
-              DesignatedInitUpdateExpr(SemaRef.Context, D->getBeginLoc(),
-                                       ExistingInit, DIE->getEndLoc());
-          StructuredList->updateInit(SemaRef.Context, StructuredIndex, DIUE);
-          StructuredList = DIUE->getUpdater();
-        }
-
-        // We need to check on source range validity because the previous
-        // initializer does not have to be an explicit initializer. e.g.,
+      else {
+        // We are creating an initializer list that initializes the
+        // subobjects of the current object, but there was already an
+        // initialization that completely initialized the current
+        // subobject, e.g., by a compound literal:
         //
-        // struct P { int a, b; };
-        // struct PP { struct P p } l = { { .a = 2 }, .p.b = 3 };
+        // struct X { int a, b; };
+        // struct X xs[] = { [0] = (struct X) { 1, 2 }, [0].b = 3 };
         //
-        // There is an overwrite taking place because the first braced initializer
-        // list "{ .a = 2 }" already provides value for .p.b (which is zero).
-        if (ExistingInit->getSourceRange().isValid()) {
-          // We are creating an initializer list that initializes the
-          // subobjects of the current object, but there was already an
-          // initialization that completely initialized the current
-          // subobject, e.g., by a compound literal:
-          //
-          // struct X { int a, b; };
-          // struct X xs[] = { [0] = (struct X) { 1, 2 }, [0].b = 3 };
-          //
-          // Here, xs[0].a == 1 and xs[0].b == 3, since the second,
-          // designated initializer re-initializes only its current object
-          // subobject [0].b.
-          SemaRef.Diag(D->getBeginLoc(),
-                       diag::warn_subobject_initializer_overrides)
-              << SourceRange(D->getBeginLoc(), DIE->getEndLoc());
-
-          SemaRef.Diag(ExistingInit->getBeginLoc(),
-                       diag::note_previous_initializer)
-              << /*FIXME:has side effects=*/0 << ExistingInit->getSourceRange();
+        // Here, xs[0].a == 1 and xs[0].b == 3, since the second,
+        // designated initializer re-initializes only its current object
+        // subobject [0].b.
+        diagnoseInitOverride(ExistingInit,
+                             SourceRange(D->getBeginLoc(), DIE->getEndLoc()),
+                             /*FullyOverwritten=*/false);
+
+        if (!VerifyOnly) {
+          if (DesignatedInitUpdateExpr *E =
+                  dyn_cast<DesignatedInitUpdateExpr>(ExistingInit))
+            StructuredList = E->getUpdater();
+          else {
+            DesignatedInitUpdateExpr *DIUE = new (SemaRef.Context)
+                DesignatedInitUpdateExpr(SemaRef.Context, D->getBeginLoc(),
+                                         ExistingInit, DIE->getEndLoc());
+            StructuredList->updateInit(SemaRef.Context, StructuredIndex, DIUE);
+            StructuredList = DIUE->getUpdater();
+          }
+        } else {
+          // We don't need to track the structured representation of a
+          // designated init update of an already-fully-initialized object in
+          // verify-only mode. The only reason we would need the structure is
+          // to determine where the uninitialized "holes" are, and in this
+          // case, we know there aren't any and we can't introduce any.
+          StructuredList = nullptr;
         }
-      } else {
-        // We don't need to track the structured representation of a designated
-        // init update of an already-fully-initialized object in verify-only
-        // mode. The only reason we would need the structure is to determine
-        // where the uninitialized "holes" are, and in this case, we know there
-        // aren't any and we can't introduce any.
-        StructuredList = nullptr;
       }
     }
   }
@@ -2475,10 +2526,11 @@ InitListChecker::CheckDesignatedInitializer(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
       }
     }
 
-    unsigned FieldIndex = 0;
-
+    unsigned NumBases = 0;
     if (auto *CXXRD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RT->getDecl()))
-      FieldIndex = CXXRD->getNumBases();
+      NumBases = CXXRD->getNumBases();
+
+    unsigned FieldIndex = NumBases;
 
     for (auto *FI : RT->getDecl()->fields()) {
       if (FI->isUnnamedBitfield())
@@ -2504,15 +2556,10 @@ InitListChecker::CheckDesignatedInitializer(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
                  && "A union should never have more than one initializer!");
 
           Expr *ExistingInit = StructuredList->getInit(0);
-          if (ExistingInit && !VerifyOnly) {
+          if (ExistingInit) {
             // We're about to throw away an initializer, emit warning.
-            SemaRef.Diag(D->getFieldLoc(),
-                         diag::warn_initializer_overrides)
-              << D->getSourceRange();
-            SemaRef.Diag(ExistingInit->getBeginLoc(),
-                         diag::note_previous_initializer)
-                << /*FIXME:has side effects=*/0
-                << ExistingInit->getSourceRange();
+            diagnoseInitOverride(
+                ExistingInit, SourceRange(D->getBeginLoc(), DIE->getEndLoc()));
           }
 
           // remove existing initializer
@@ -2535,6 +2582,54 @@ InitListChecker::CheckDesignatedInitializer(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
       return true;
     }
 
+    // C++20 [dcl.init.list]p3:
+    //   The ordered identifiers in the designators of the designated-
+    //   initializer-list shall form a subsequence of the ordered identifiers
+    //   in the direct non-static data members of T.
+    //
+    // Note that this is not a condition on forming the aggregate
+    // initialization, only on actually performing initialization,
+    // so it is not checked in VerifyOnly mode.
+    //
+    // FIXME: This is the only reordering diagnostic we produce, and it only
+    // catches cases where we have a top-level field designator that jumps
+    // backwards. This is the only such case that is reachable in an
+    // otherwise-valid C++20 program, so is the only case that's required for
+    // conformance, but for consistency, we should diagnose all the other
+    // cases where a designator takes us backwards too.
+    if (IsFirstDesignator && !VerifyOnly && SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
+        NextField &&
+        (*NextField == RT->getDecl()->field_end() ||
+         (*NextField)->getFieldIndex() > Field->getFieldIndex() + 1)) {
+      // Find the field that we just initialized.
+      FieldDecl *PrevField = nullptr;
+      for (auto FI = RT->getDecl()->field_begin();
+           FI != RT->getDecl()->field_end(); ++FI) {
+        if (FI->isUnnamedBitfield())
+          continue;
+        if (*NextField != RT->getDecl()->field_end() &&
+            declaresSameEntity(*FI, **NextField))
+          break;
+        PrevField = *FI;
+      }
+
+      if (PrevField &&
+          PrevField->getFieldIndex() > KnownField->getFieldIndex()) {
+        SemaRef.Diag(DIE->getBeginLoc(), diag::ext_designated_init_reordered)
+            << KnownField << PrevField << DIE->getSourceRange();
+
+        unsigned OldIndex = NumBases + PrevField->getFieldIndex();
+        if (StructuredList && OldIndex <= StructuredList->getNumInits()) {
+          if (Expr *PrevInit = StructuredList->getInit(OldIndex)) {
+            SemaRef.Diag(PrevInit->getBeginLoc(),
+                         diag::note_previous_field_init)
+                << PrevField << PrevInit->getSourceRange();
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+
+
     // Update the designator with the field declaration.
     if (!VerifyOnly)
       D->setField(*Field);
@@ -2875,7 +2970,7 @@ InitListChecker::getStructuredSubobjectInit(InitListExpr *IList, unsigned Index,
     if (!IsFullyOverwritten)
       return Result;
 
-  if (ExistingInit && !VerifyOnly) {
+  if (ExistingInit) {
     // We are creating an initializer list that initializes the
     // subobjects of the current object, but there was already an
     // initialization that completely initialized the current
@@ -2895,11 +2990,7 @@ InitListChecker::getStructuredSubobjectInit(InitListExpr *IList, unsigned Index,
     // struct X xs[] = { [0] = (struct X) { 1, 2 }, [0].b = 3 };
     //
     // This case is handled by CheckDesignatedInitializer.
-    SemaRef.Diag(InitRange.getBegin(),
-                 diag::warn_subobject_initializer_overrides)
-      << InitRange;
-    SemaRef.Diag(ExistingInit->getBeginLoc(), diag::note_previous_initializer)
-        << /*FIXME:has side effects=*/0 << ExistingInit->getSourceRange();
+    diagnoseInitOverride(ExistingInit, InitRange);
   }
 
   unsigned ExpectedNumInits = 0;
@@ -2968,24 +3059,23 @@ void InitListChecker::UpdateStructuredListElement(InitListExpr *StructuredList,
   if (Expr *PrevInit = StructuredList->updateInit(SemaRef.Context,
                                                   StructuredIndex, expr)) {
     // This initializer overwrites a previous initializer. Warn.
-    // We need to check on source range validity because the previous
-    // initializer does not have to be an explicit initializer.
-    // struct P { int a, b; };
-    // struct PP { struct P p } l = { { .a = 2 }, .p.b = 3 };
-    // There is an overwrite taking place because the first braced initializer
-    // list "{ .a = 2 }' already provides value for .p.b (which is zero).
-    if (PrevInit->getSourceRange().isValid() && !VerifyOnly) {
-      SemaRef.Diag(expr->getBeginLoc(), diag::warn_initializer_overrides)
-          << expr->getSourceRange();
-
-      SemaRef.Diag(PrevInit->getBeginLoc(), diag::note_previous_initializer)
-          << /*FIXME:has side effects=*/0 << PrevInit->getSourceRange();
-    }
+    diagnoseInitOverride(PrevInit, expr->getSourceRange());
   }
 
   ++StructuredIndex;
 }
 
+/// Determine whether we can perform aggregate initialization for the purposes
+/// of overload resolution.
+bool Sema::CanPerformAggregateInitializationForOverloadResolution(
+    const InitializedEntity &Entity, InitListExpr *From) {
+  QualType Type = Entity.getType();
+  InitListChecker Check(*this, Entity, From, Type, /*VerifyOnly=*/true,
+                        /*TreatUnavailableAsInvalid=*/false,
+                        /*InOverloadResolution=*/true);
+  return !Check.HadError();
+}
+
 /// Check that the given Index expression is a valid array designator
 /// value. This is essentially just a wrapper around
 /// VerifyIntegerConstantExpression that also checks for negative values
@@ -3019,6 +3109,7 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Designation &Desig,
   bool Invalid = false;
   SmallVector<ASTDesignator, 32> Designators;
   SmallVector<Expr *, 32> InitExpressions;
+  bool HasArrayDesignator = false;
 
   // Build designators and check array designator expressions.
   for (unsigned Idx = 0; Idx < Desig.getNumDesignators(); ++Idx) {
@@ -3042,6 +3133,7 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Designation &Desig,
                                             D.getRBracketLoc()));
         InitExpressions.push_back(Index);
       }
+      HasArrayDesignator = true;
       break;
     }
 
@@ -3085,6 +3177,7 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Designation &Desig,
           InitExpressions.push_back(EndIndex);
         }
       }
+      HasArrayDesignator = true;
       break;
     }
     }
@@ -3096,17 +3189,8 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Designation &Desig,
   // Clear out the expressions within the designation.
   Desig.ClearExprs(*this);
 
-  DesignatedInitExpr *DIE
-    = DesignatedInitExpr::Create(Context,
-                                 Designators,
-                                 InitExpressions, Loc, GNUSyntax,
-                                 Init.getAs<Expr>());
-
-  if (!getLangOpts().C99)
-    Diag(DIE->getBeginLoc(), diag::ext_designated_init)
-        << DIE->getSourceRange();
-
-  return DIE;
+  return DesignatedInitExpr::Create(Context, Designators, InitExpressions, Loc,
+                                    GNUSyntax, Init.getAs<Expr>());
 }
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp

@@ -4920,13 +4920,11 @@ TryListConversion(Sema &S, InitListExpr *From, QualType ToType,
     // Type is an aggregate, argument is an init list. At this point it comes
     // down to checking whether the initialization works.
     // FIXME: Find out whether this parameter is consumed or not.
-    // FIXME: Expose SemaInit's aggregate initialization code so that we don't
-    // need to call into the initialization code here; overload resolution
-    // should not be doing that.
     InitializedEntity Entity =
         InitializedEntity::InitializeParameter(S.Context, ToType,
                                                /*Consumed=*/false);
-    if (S.CanPerformCopyInitialization(Entity, From)) {
+    if (S.CanPerformAggregateInitializationForOverloadResolution(Entity,
+                                                                 From)) {
       Result.setUserDefined();
       Result.UserDefined.Before.setAsIdentityConversion();
       // Initializer lists don't have a type.

lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h

@@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@ public:
   ExprResult RebuildInitList(SourceLocation LBraceLoc,
                              MultiExprArg Inits,
                              SourceLocation RBraceLoc) {
-    return SemaRef.ActOnInitList(LBraceLoc, Inits, RBraceLoc);
+    return SemaRef.BuildInitList(LBraceLoc, Inits, RBraceLoc);
   }
 
   /// Build a new designated initializer expression.

test/Analysis/globals.cpp

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core -verify -std=c++2a %s
 
 
 static const unsigned long long scull = 0;

test/CXX/expr/expr.const/p2-0x.cpp

@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ namespace LValueToRValueUnion {
   extern const U pu;
   constexpr const int *pua = &pu.a;
   constexpr const int *pub = &pu.b;
-  constexpr U pu = { .b = 1 }; // expected-warning {{C99 feature}}
+  constexpr U pu = { .b = 1 }; // expected-warning {{C++20 extension}}
   constexpr const int a2 = *pua; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{read of member 'a' of union with active member 'b'}}
   constexpr const int b2 = *pub; // ok
 }

test/CodeGenObjCXX/designated-initializers.mm

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm64 %s -verify -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm64 %s -verify -emit-llvm -o - -Wno-c99-designator | FileCheck %s
 // expected-no-diagnostics
 
 // Make sure we don't enter an infinite loop (rdar://21942503)

test/PCH/cxx1y-default-initializer.cpp

@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ C<int> ci;
 
 static_assert(A{}.z == 3, "");
 static_assert(A{1}.z == 4, "");
-static_assert(A{.y = 5}.z == 5, ""); // expected-warning {{C99}}
-static_assert(A{3, .y = 1}.z == 4, ""); // expected-warning {{C99}}
+static_assert(A{.y = 5}.z == 5, ""); // expected-warning {{C++20}}
+static_assert(A{3, .y = 1}.z == 4, ""); // expected-warning {{C99}} expected-note {{here}}
 static_assert(make<int>().z == 3, "");
 static_assert(make<int>(12).z == 15, "");
 static_assert(C<int>().c == 0, "");

test/Parser/cxx0x-lambda-expressions.cpp

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-unused-value -verify -std=c++11 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-unused-value -verify -std=c++2a %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-unused-value -verify -std=c++11 -Wno-c99-designator %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-unused-value -verify -std=c++2a -Wno-c99-designator %s
 
 enum E { e };
 

test/Parser/objc-init.m

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile -verify -pedantic -Wno-objc-root-class %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile -verify -x objective-c++ -Wno-objc-root-class %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile -verify -x objective-c++ -Wno-objc-root-class -std=c++98 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile -verify -x objective-c++ -Wno-objc-root-class -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile -verify -x objective-c++ -Wno-c99-designator -Wno-objc-root-class %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile -verify -x objective-c++ -Wno-c99-designator -Wno-objc-root-class -std=c++98 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile -verify -x objective-c++ -Wno-c99-designator -Wno-objc-root-class -std=c++11 %s
 // rdar://5707001
 
 @interface NSNumber;

test/Sema/designated-initializers.c

@@ -130,10 +130,10 @@ int get8() { ++counter; return 8; }
 void test() {
   struct X xs[] = { 
     [0] = (struct X){1, 2}, // expected-note 2 {{previous initialization is here}}
-    [0].c = 3,  // expected-warning{{subobject initialization overrides initialization of other fields within its enclosing subobject}}
+    [0].c = 3,  // expected-warning{{initializer partially overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
     (struct X) {4, 5, 6}, // expected-note{{previous initialization is here}}
-    [1].b = get8(), // expected-warning{{subobject initialization overrides initialization of other fields within its enclosing subobject}}
-    [0].b = 8   // expected-warning{{subobject initialization overrides initialization of other fields within its enclosing subobject}}
+    [1].b = get8(), // expected-warning{{initializer partially overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
+    [0].b = 8   // expected-warning{{initializer partially overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
   };
 }
 
@@ -331,20 +331,20 @@ struct overwrite_string_struct {
   char L[6];
   int M;
 } overwrite_string[] = {
-  { { "foo" }, 1 }, // expected-note {{previous initialization is here}}
-  [0].L[2] = 'x' // expected-warning{{subobject initialization overrides initialization of other fields}}
+  { { "foo" }, 1 }, // expected-note{{previous initialization is here}}
+  [0].L[2] = 'x' // expected-warning{{initializer partially overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
 };
 struct overwrite_string_struct2 {
   char L[6];
   int M;
 } overwrite_string2[] = {
     { { "foo" }, 1 }, // expected-note{{previous initialization is here}}
-    [0].L[4] = 'x' // expected-warning{{subobject initialization overrides initialization of other fields}}
+    [0].L[4] = 'x' // expected-warning{{initializer partially overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
   };
 struct overwrite_string_struct
 overwrite_string3[] = {
   "foo", 1,           // expected-note{{previous initialization is here}}
-  [0].L[4] = 'x'  // expected-warning{{subobject initialization overrides initialization of other fields}}
+  [0].L[4] = 'x'  // expected-warning{{initializer partially overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
 };
 struct overwrite_string_struct
 overwrite_string4[] = {

test/Sema/static-assert.c

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -pedantic -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,ext %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -xc++ -std=c++11 -pedantic -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,ext %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -xc++ -std=c++11 -pedantic -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,ext,cxx %s
 
 _Static_assert("foo", "string is nonzero"); // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
 #ifndef __cplusplus
@@ -42,10 +42,7 @@ struct A {
   }
 
 typedef UNION(unsigned, struct A) U1; // ext-warning 3 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
-UNION(char[2], short) u2 = { .one = { 'a', 'b' } }; // ext-warning 3 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
-#if defined(__cplusplus)
-// ext-warning@-2 {{designated initializers are a C99 feature}}
-#endif
+UNION(char[2], short) u2 = { .one = { 'a', 'b' } }; // ext-warning 3 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}} cxx-warning {{designated initializers are a C++20 extension}}
 typedef UNION(char, short) U3; // expected-error {{static_assert failed due to requirement 'sizeof(char) == sizeof(short)' "type size mismatch"}} \
                                // ext-warning 3 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
 typedef UNION(float, 0.5f) U4; // expected-error {{expected a type}} \

test/SemaCXX/aggregate-initialization.cpp

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s 
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++14 %s 
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 %s 
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++14 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++2a %s
 
 // Verify that using an initializer list for a non-aggregate looks for
 // constructors..

test/SemaCXX/c99.cpp

@@ -1,9 +1,70 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -verify=expected,cxx17 -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -verify=expected,cxx20 -std=c++2a %s
+
+// cxx17-warning@* 0+{{designated initializers are a C++20 extension}}
+
 void f1(int i[static 5]) { // expected-error{{C99}}
 }
 
 struct Point { int x; int y; int z[]; }; // expected-warning{{flexible array members are a C99 feature}}
 
-Point p1 = { .x = 17, // expected-warning{{designated initializers are a C99 feature}}
-             y: 25 }; // expected-warning{{designated initializers are a C99 feature}} \
-                      // expected-warning{{use of GNU old-style field designator extension}}
+Point p1 = { .x = 17,
+             y: 25 }; // expected-warning{{use of GNU old-style field designator extension}}
+
+Point p2 = {
+  .x = 17, // expected-warning {{mixture of designated and non-designated initializers in the same initializer list is a C99 extension}}
+  25 // expected-note {{first non-designated initializer}}
+};
+
+Point p3 = {
+  .x = 17, // expected-note {{previous initialization is here}}
+  .x = 18, // expected-warning {{initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
+};
+
+Point p4 = {
+  .x = 17, // expected-warning {{mixture of designated and non-designated initializers in the same initializer list is a C99 extension}}
+  25, // expected-note {{first non-designated initializer}}
+  // expected-note@-1 {{previous initialization is here}}
+  .y = 18, // expected-warning {{initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject}}
+};
+
+int arr[1] = {[0] = 0}; // expected-warning {{array designators are a C99 extension}}
+
+struct Pt { int x, y; };
+struct Rect { Pt tl, br; };
+Rect r = {
+  .tl.x = 0 // expected-warning {{nested designators are a C99 extension}}
+};
+
+struct NonTrivial {
+  NonTrivial();
+  ~NonTrivial();
+};
+struct S {
+  int a;
+  NonTrivial b;
+};
+struct T {
+  S s;
+};
+S f();
+
+T t1 = {
+  .s = f()
+};
+
+// It's important that we reject this; we would not destroy the existing
+// 'NonTrivial' object before overwriting it (and even calling its destructor
+// would not necessarily be correct).
+T t2 = {
+  .s = f(), // expected-note {{previous}}
+  .s.b = NonTrivial() // expected-error {{initializer would partially override prior initialization of object of type 'S' with non-trivial destruction}}
+  // expected-warning@-1 {{nested}}
+};
+
+// FIXME: It might be reasonable to accept this.
+T t3 = {
+  .s = f(), // expected-note {{previous}}
+  .s.a = 0 // expected-error {{initializer would partially override prior initialization of object of type 'S' with non-trivial destruction}}
+  // expected-warning@-1 {{nested}}
+};

test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-pointer-arith -Wno-zero-length-array -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify -std=c++11 -pedantic %s -Wno-comment -Wno-tautological-pointer-compare -Wno-bool-conversion
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-pointer-arith -Wno-zero-length-array -Wno-c99-designator -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify -std=c++11 -pedantic %s -Wno-comment -Wno-tautological-pointer-compare -Wno-bool-conversion
 
 namespace StaticAssertFoldTest {
 
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ static_assert(fail(*(&(&(*(*&(&zs[2] - 1)[0] + 2 - 2))[2])[-1][2] - 2)) == 11, "
 expected-error {{static_assert expression is not an integral constant expression}} \
 expected-note {{in call to 'fail(zs[1][0][1][0])'}}
 
-constexpr int arr[40] = { 1, 2, 3, [8] = 4 }; // expected-warning {{C99 feature}}
+constexpr int arr[40] = { 1, 2, 3, [8] = 4 };
 constexpr int SumNonzero(const int *p) {
   return *p + (*p ? SumNonzero(p+1) : 0);
 }
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ union U {
   int b;
 };
 
-constexpr U u[4] = { { .a = 0 }, { .b = 1 }, { .a = 2 }, { .b = 3 } }; // expected-warning 4{{C99 feature}}
+constexpr U u[4] = { { .a = 0 }, { .b = 1 }, { .a = 2 }, { .b = 3 } };
 static_assert(u[0].a == 0, "");
 static_assert(u[0].b, ""); // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{read of member 'b' of union with active member 'a'}}
 static_assert(u[1].b == 1, "");

test/SemaCXX/constexpr-printing.cpp

@@ -41,11 +41,7 @@ expected-error {{constant expression}} \
 expected-note {{in call to 'test_printing(12, 3.976200e+01, 3+4i, 1.290000e+01+3.600000e+00i, &u2.T::arr[4], u2.another.arr[2], {5, 1, 2, 3}, {{{}}, {{}}, &u1.T::arr[2]})'}}
 
 struct V {
-  // FIXME: when we can generate these as constexpr constructors, remove the
-  // explicit definitions.
-  constexpr V() : arr{[255] = 42} {}
-  constexpr V(const V &v) : arr{[255] = 42} {}
-  int arr[256];
+  int arr[256] = {[255] = 42}; // expected-warning {{C99}}
 };
 constexpr V v;
 constexpr int get(const int *p) { return *p; } // expected-note {{read of dereferenced one-past-the-end pointer}}

test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-constructor.cpp

@@ -406,6 +406,6 @@ namespace PR11410 {
     0, 1
   }; // expected-error {{ambiguous}} expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 2}}
   C c2[3] = {
-    [0] = 1, [2] = 3
+    [0] = 1, [2] = 3 // expected-warning {{C99}}
   }; // expected-error {{ambiguous}} expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 1}}
 }

test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-initializer-aggregates.cpp

@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a %s -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a %s -verify=expected,pedantic,override,reorder -pedantic-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a %s -verify=expected,pedantic -Werror=c99-designator -Wno-reorder -Wno-initializer-overrides
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a %s -verify=expected,reorder -Wno-c99-designator -Werror=reorder -Wno-initializer-overrides
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a %s -verify=expected,override -Wno-c99-designator -Wno-reorder -Werror=initializer-overrides
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a %s -verify -Wno-c99-designator -Wno-reorder -Wno-initializer-overrides
+
 
 namespace class_with_ctor {
   struct A { // expected-note 6{{candidate}}
@@ -21,3 +26,105 @@ namespace class_with_ctor {
   C c1 = {{}, {}}; // ok, call default ctor twice
   C c2 = {{1, 2}, {3, 4}}; // expected-error 2{{no matching constructor}}
 }
+
+namespace designator {
+struct A { int x, y; };
+struct B { A a; };
+
+A a1 = {
+  .y = 1, // reorder-note {{previous initialization for field 'y' is here}}
+  .x = 2 // reorder-error {{ISO C++ requires field designators to be specified in declaration order; field 'y' will be initialized after field 'x'}}
+};
+int arr[3] = {[1] = 5}; // pedantic-error {{array designators are a C99 extension}}
+B b = {.a.x = 0}; // pedantic-error {{nested designators are a C99 extension}}
+A a2 = {
+  .x = 1, // pedantic-error {{mixture of designated and non-designated initializers in the same initializer list is a C99 extension}}
+  2 // pedantic-note {{first non-designated initializer is here}}
+};
+A a3 = {
+  1, // pedantic-note {{first non-designated initializer is here}}
+  .y = 2 // pedantic-error {{mixture of designated and non-designated initializers in the same initializer list is a C99 extension}}
+};
+A a4 = {
+  .x = 1, // override-note {{previous}}
+  .x = 1 // override-error {{overrides prior initialization}}
+};
+A a5 = {
+  .y = 1, // override-note {{previous}}
+  .y = 1 // override-error {{overrides prior initialization}}
+};
+struct C { int :0, x, :0, y, :0; };
+C c = {
+  .x = 1, // override-note {{previous}}
+  .x = 1, // override-error {{overrides prior initialization}} override-note {{previous}}
+  .y = 1, // override-note {{previous}}
+  .y = 1, // override-error {{overrides prior initialization}}
+  .x = 1, // reorder-error {{declaration order}} override-error {{overrides prior initialization}} override-note {{previous}}
+  .x = 1, // override-error {{overrides prior initialization}}
+};
+}
+
+namespace base_class {
+  struct base {
+    int x;
+  };
+  struct derived : base {
+    int y;
+  };
+  derived d = {.x = 1, .y = 2}; // expected-error {{'x' does not refer to any field}}
+}
+
+namespace union_ {
+  union U { int a, b; };
+  U u = {
+    .a = 1, // override-note {{here}}
+    .b = 2, // override-error {{overrides prior}}
+  };
+}
+
+namespace overload_resolution {
+  struct A { int x, y; };
+  union B { int x, y; };
+
+  void f(A a);
+  void f(B b) = delete;
+  void g() { f({.x = 1, .y = 2}); } // ok, calls non-union overload
+
+  // As an extension of the union case, overload resolution won't pick any
+  // candidate where a field initializer would be overridden.
+  struct A2 { int x, other, y; };
+  int f(A2);
+  void g2() { int k = f({.x = 1, 2, .y = 3}); (void)k; } // pedantic-error {{mixture of designated and non-designated}} pedantic-note {{here}}
+
+  struct C { int x; };
+  void h(A a); // expected-note {{candidate}}
+  void h(C c); // expected-note {{candidate}}
+  void i() {
+    h({.x = 1, .y = 2});
+    h({.y = 1, .x = 2}); // reorder-error {{declaration order}} reorder-note {{previous}}
+    h({.x = 1}); // expected-error {{ambiguous}}
+  }
+
+  struct D { int y, x; };
+  void j(A a); // expected-note {{candidate}}
+  void j(D d); // expected-note {{candidate}}
+  void k() {
+    j({.x = 1, .y = 2}); // expected-error {{ambiguous}}
+  }
+}
+
+namespace deduction {
+  struct A { int x, y; };
+  union B { int x, y; };
+
+  template<typename T, typename U> void f(decltype(T{.x = 1, .y = 2}) = {});
+  template<typename T, typename U> void f(decltype(U{.x = 1, .y = 2}) = {}) = delete;
+  void g() { f<A, B>(); } // ok, calls non-union overload
+
+  struct C { int y, x; };
+  template<typename T, typename U> void h(decltype(T{.y = 1, .x = 2}) = {}) = delete;
+  template<typename T, typename U> void h(decltype(U{.y = 1, .x = 2}) = {});
+  void i() {
+    h<A, C>(); // ok, selects C overload by SFINAE
+  }
+}

test/SemaCXX/decltype.cpp

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-c99-designator %s
 
 // PR5290
 int const f0();
@@ -80,22 +80,22 @@ namespace D5789 {
   struct P1 { char x[6]; } g1 = { "foo" };
   struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
 
-  // expected-warning@+3 {{subobject initialization overrides}}
+  // expected-warning@+3 {{initializer partially overrides}}
   // expected-note@+2 {{previous initialization}}
   // expected-note@+1 {{previous definition}}
   template<class T> void foo(decltype(T(LP1{ .p1 = g1, .p1.x[1] = 'x' }))) {}
 
-  // expected-warning@+3 {{subobject initialization overrides}}
+  // expected-warning@+3 {{initializer partially overrides}}
   // expected-note@+2 {{previous initialization}}
   template<class T>
   void foo(decltype(T(LP1{ .p1 = g1, .p1.x[1] = 'r' }))) {} // okay
 
-  // expected-warning@+3 {{subobject initialization overrides}}
+  // expected-warning@+3 {{initializer partially overrides}}
   // expected-note@+2 {{previous initialization}}
   template<class T>
   void foo(decltype(T(LP1{ .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[1] = 'x'}))) {} // okay
 
-  // expected-warning@+3 {{subobject initialization overrides}}
+  // expected-warning@+3 {{initializer partially overrides}}
   // expected-note@+2 {{previous initialization}}
   // expected-error@+1 {{redefinition of 'foo'}}
   template<class T> void foo(decltype(T(LP1{ .p1 = g1, .p1.x[1] = 'x' }))) {}

test/SemaCXX/designated-initializers-base-class.cpp

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c++1z -fsyntax-only -verify -Winitializer-overrides
-// expected-no-diagnostics
 
 struct B {
   int x;
@@ -9,4 +8,4 @@ struct D : B {
   int y;
 };
 
-void test() { D d = {1, .y = 2}; }
+void test() { D d = {1, .y = 2}; } // expected-warning {{C99 extension}} expected-note {{}}

test/SemaCXX/designated-initializers.cpp

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Winitializer-overrides %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Woverride-init %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-reorder -Wno-c99-designator -Winitializer-overrides %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-reorder -Wno-c99-designator -Woverride-init %s
 
 template <typename T> struct Foo {
   struct SubFoo {

test/SemaCXX/eval-crashes.cpp

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ namespace pr33140_3 {
   struct X {
     Y_t a;
   };
-  struct X foo[2] = {[0 ... 1] = {.a = (Y_t){.c = 0}}};
+  struct X foo[2] = {[0 ... 1] = {.a = (Y_t){.c = 0}}}; // expected-warning {{C99 extension}}
 }
 
 namespace pr33140_6 {

test/SemaCXX/member-init.cpp

@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ void g() { f<int>(); } // expected-note {{in instantiation of function template
 namespace PR22056 {
 template <int N>
 struct S {
-  int x[3] = {[N] = 3};
+  int x[3] = {[N] = 3}; // expected-warning {{C99 extension}}
 };
 }
 

test/SemaObjCXX/message.mm

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ struct identity {
 #if __cplusplus <= 199711L
   // expected-warning@-2 {{'typename' occurs outside of a template}}
 #endif
-  int array[5] = {[3] = 2};
+  int array[5] = {[3] = 2}; // expected-warning {{C99 extension}}
   return [super method];
 }
 @end

test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-c99.cpp

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Wno-c99-extensions -Wno-reorder -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Wno-c99-extensions -Wno-reorder -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Wno-c99-extensions -Wno-reorder -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
 
 // Test template instantiation for C99-specific features.
 

test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-init.cpp

@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ namespace InitListUpdate {
 
   // Check that an init list update doesn't "lose" the pack-ness of an expression.
   template <int... N> void f() {
-    g(AA{0, [0].n = N} ...); // expected-warning 3{{overrides prior init}} expected-note 3{{previous init}}
-    g(AA{N, [0].n = 0} ...); // expected-warning 3{{overrides prior init}} expected-note 3{{previous init}}
+    g(AA{0, [0].n = N} ...); // expected-warning 3{{extension}} expected-note {{here}} expected-warning 3{{overrides prior init}} expected-note 3{{previous init}}
+    g(AA{N, [0].n = 0} ...); // expected-warning 3{{extension}} expected-note {{here}} expected-warning 3{{overrides prior init}} expected-note 3{{previous init}}
   };
 
   void g(AA, AA);