[docs] Fixing Sphinx warnings to unclog the buildbot

Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).

Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.

This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).

Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.

I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@276109 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

docs/CodeGenerator.rst

@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ For example, consider this simple LLVM example:
 The X86 instruction selector might produce this machine code for the ``div`` and
 ``ret``:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ;; Start of div
   %EAX = mov %reg1024           ;; Copy X (in reg1024) into EAX
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ By the end of code generation, the register allocator would coalesce the
 registers and delete the resultant identity moves producing the following
 code:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ;; X is in EAX, Y is in ECX
   mov %EAX, %EDX
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ target code.  For example, consider the following LLVM fragment:
 
 This LLVM code corresponds to a SelectionDAG that looks basically like this:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   (fadd:f32 (fmul:f32 (fadd:f32 W, X), Y), Z)
 

docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.rst

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ exists anywhere in the file.
 The FileCheck -check-prefix option
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-The FileCheck :option:`-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
+The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
 configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file.  This is useful in many
 circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
 :program:`llc`.  Here's a simple example:
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
 
 So, for instance, the code below will pass:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
   ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ So, for instance, the code below will pass:
 
 While this other code, will not:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
   ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
 
 matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
        DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset]   (0x00000233)
        DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp]  ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")

docs/CommandGuide/llvm-nm.rst

@@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ OPTIONS
 
 .. option:: -B    (default)
 
- Use BSD output format.  Alias for :option:`--format=bsd`.
+ Use BSD output format.  Alias for `--format=bsd`.
 
 .. option:: -P
 
- Use POSIX.2 output format.  Alias for :option:`--format=posix`.
+ Use POSIX.2 output format.  Alias for `--format=posix`.
 
 .. option:: --debug-syms, -a
 

docs/CommandGuide/opt.rst

@@ -12,16 +12,16 @@ DESCRIPTION
 The :program:`opt` command is the modular LLVM optimizer and analyzer.  It
 takes LLVM source files as input, runs the specified optimizations or analyses
 on it, and then outputs the optimized file or the analysis results.  The
-function of :program:`opt` depends on whether the :option:`-analyze` option is
+function of :program:`opt` depends on whether the `-analyze` option is
 given.
 
-When :option:`-analyze` is specified, :program:`opt` performs various analyses
+When `-analyze` is specified, :program:`opt` performs various analyses
 of the input source.  It will usually print the results on standard output, but
 in a few cases, it will print output to standard error or generate a file with
 the analysis output, which is usually done when the output is meant for another
 program.
 
-While :option:`-analyze` is *not* given, :program:`opt` attempts to produce an
+While `-analyze` is *not* given, :program:`opt` attempts to produce an
 optimized output file.  The optimizations available via :program:`opt` depend
 upon what libraries were linked into it as well as any additional libraries
 that have been loaded with the :option:`-load` option.  Use the :option:`-help`
@@ -68,19 +68,19 @@ OPTIONS
 
 .. option:: -disable-opt
 
- This option is only meaningful when :option:`-std-link-opts` is given.  It
+ This option is only meaningful when `-std-link-opts` is given.  It
  disables most passes.
 
 .. option:: -strip-debug
 
  This option causes opt to strip debug information from the module before
- applying other optimizations.  It is essentially the same as :option:`-strip`
+ applying other optimizations.  It is essentially the same as `-strip`
  but it ensures that stripping of debug information is done first.
 
 .. option:: -verify-each
 
  This option causes opt to add a verify pass after every pass otherwise
- specified on the command line (including :option:`-verify`).  This is useful
+ specified on the command line (including `-verify`).  This is useful
  for cases where it is suspected that a pass is creating an invalid module but
  it is not clear which pass is doing it.
 

docs/ExceptionHandling.rst

@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ outlined.  After the handler is outlined, this intrinsic is simply removed.
 ``llvm.eh.exceptionpointer``
 ----------------------------
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   i8 addrspace(N)* @llvm.eh.padparam.pNi8(token %catchpad)
 
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ backend.  Uses of them are generated by the backend's
 ``llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp``
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   i32 @llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp(i8* %setjmp_buf)
 
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ all of the new IR instructions:
     return 0;
   }
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define i32 @f() nounwind personality i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 {
   entry:
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ C++ code:
     }
   }
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define void @f() #0 personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
   entry:

docs/Extensions.rst

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ The following additional relocation types are supported:
 corresponds to the COFF relocation types ``IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32NB`` (32-bit) or
 ``IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB`` (64-bit).
 
-.. code-block:: gas
+.. code-block:: text
 
   .text
   fun:

docs/GarbageCollection.rst

@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ IR features is specified by the selected :ref:`GC strategy description
 Specifying GC code generation: ``gc "..."``
 -------------------------------------------
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define <returntype> @name(...) gc "name" { ... }
 

docs/GetElementPtr.rst

@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ memory, or a global variable.
 
 To make this clear, let's consider a more obtuse example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   %MyVar = uninitialized global i32
   ...
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ Quick answer: there are no superfluous indices.
 This question arises most often when the GEP instruction is applied to a global
 variable which is always a pointer type. For example, consider this:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   %MyStruct = uninitialized global { float*, i32 }
   ...
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ The GetElementPtr instruction dereferences nothing. That is, it doesn't access
 memory in any way. That's what the Load and Store instructions are for.  GEP is
 only involved in the computation of addresses. For example, consider this:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   %MyVar = uninitialized global { [40 x i32 ]* }
   ...
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ illegal.
 In order to access the 18th integer in the array, you would need to do the
 following:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   %idx = getelementptr { [40 x i32]* }, { [40 x i32]* }* %, i64 0, i32 0
   %arr = load [40 x i32]** %idx
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ following:
 In this case, we have to load the pointer in the structure with a load
 instruction before we can index into the array. If the example was changed to:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   %MyVar = uninitialized global { [40 x i32 ] }
   ...

docs/HowToUseInstrMappings.rst

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ instructions with each other. These tables are emitted in the
 ``XXXInstrInfo.inc`` file along with the functions to query them. Following
 is the definition of ``InstrMapping`` class definied in Target.td file:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class InstrMapping {
     // Used to reduce search space only to the instructions using this
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ non-predicated form by assigning appropriate values to the ``InstrMapping``
 fields. For this relationship, non-predicated instructions are treated as key
 instruction since they are the one used to query the interface function.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def getPredOpcode : InstrMapping {
     // Choose a FilterClass that is used as a base class for all the
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ to include relevant information in its definition. For example, consider
 following to be the current definitions of ADD, ADD_pt (true) and ADD_pf (false)
 instructions:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def ADD : ALU32_rr<(outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins IntRegs:$a, IntRegs:$b),
               "$dst = add($a, $b)",
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ In this step, we modify these instructions to include the information
 required by the relationship model, <tt>getPredOpcode</tt>, so that they can
 be related.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def ADD : PredRel, ALU32_rr<(outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins IntRegs:$a, IntRegs:$b),
               "$dst = add($a, $b)",

docs/InAlloca.rst

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ that passes two default-constructed ``Foo`` objects to ``g`` in the
       g(Foo(), Foo());
     }
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %struct.Foo = type { i32, i32 }
     declare void @Foo_ctor(%struct.Foo* %this)

docs/LangRef.rst

@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ Note that the Mach-O platform doesn't support COMDATs and ELF only supports
 Here is an example of a COMDAT group where a function will only be selected if
 the COMDAT key's section is the largest:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    $foo = comdat largest
    @foo = global i32 2, comdat($foo)
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ the COMDAT key's section is the largest:
 As a syntactic sugar the ``$name`` can be omitted if the name is the same as
 the global name:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   $foo = comdat any
   @foo = global i32 2, comdat
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ if a collision occurs in the symbol table.
 The combined use of COMDATS and section attributes may yield surprising results.
 For example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    $foo = comdat any
    $bar = comdat any
@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ makes the format of the prologue data highly target dependent.
 A trivial example of valid prologue data for the x86 architecture is ``i8 144``,
 which encodes the ``nop`` instruction:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     define void @f() prologue i8 144 { ... }
 
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ Generally prologue data can be formed by encoding a relative branch instruction
 which skips the metadata, as in this example of valid prologue data for the
 x86_64 architecture, where the first two bytes encode ``jmp .+10``:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %0 = type <{ i8, i8, i8* }>
 
@@ -2237,7 +2237,7 @@ source file name to the local function name.
 
 The syntax for the source file name is simply:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     source_filename = "/path/to/source.c"
 
@@ -2847,7 +2847,7 @@ cleared low bit. However, in the ``%C`` example, the optimizer is
 allowed to assume that the '``undef``' operand could be the same as
 ``%Y``, allowing the whole '``select``' to be eliminated.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       %A = xor undef, undef
 
@@ -2899,7 +2899,7 @@ does not execute at all. This allows us to delete the divide and all
 code after it. Because the undefined operation "can't happen", the
 optimizer can assume that it occurs in dead code.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     a:  store undef -> %X
     b:  store %X -> undef
@@ -3884,7 +3884,7 @@ their operand. For example:
 
 Metadata nodes that aren't uniqued use the ``distinct`` keyword. For example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = distinct !{!"test\00", i32 10}
 
@@ -3949,7 +3949,7 @@ fields are tuples containing the debug info to be emitted along with the compile
 unit, regardless of code optimizations (some nodes are only emitted if there are
 references to them from instructions).
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang",
                         isOptimized: true, flags: "-O2", runtimeVersion: 2,
@@ -3985,7 +3985,7 @@ DIBasicType
 ``DIBasicType`` nodes represent primitive types, such as ``int``, ``bool`` and
 ``float``. ``tag:`` defaults to ``DW_TAG_base_type``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = !DIBasicType(name: "unsigned char", size: 8, align: 8,
                       encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned_char)
@@ -3994,7 +3994,7 @@ DIBasicType
 The ``encoding:`` describes the details of the type. Usually it's one of the
 following:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   DW_ATE_address       = 1
   DW_ATE_boolean       = 2
@@ -4014,7 +4014,7 @@ refers to a tuple; the first operand is the return type, while the rest are the
 types of the formal arguments in order. If the first operand is ``null``, that
 represents a function with no return value (such as ``void foo() {}`` in C++).
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = !BasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, DW_ATE_signed)
     !1 = !BasicType(name: "char", size: 8, align: 8, DW_ATE_signed_char)
@@ -4028,7 +4028,7 @@ DIDerivedType
 ``DIDerivedType`` nodes represent types derived from other types, such as
 qualified types.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = !DIBasicType(name: "unsigned char", size: 8, align: 8,
                       encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned_char)
@@ -4037,7 +4037,7 @@ qualified types.
 
 The following ``tag:`` values are valid:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   DW_TAG_member             = 13
   DW_TAG_pointer_type       = 15
@@ -4089,7 +4089,7 @@ does not have  ``flags: DIFlagFwdDecl`` set.  LLVM tools that link modules
 together will unique such definitions at parse time via the ``identifier:``
 field, even if the nodes are ``distinct``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = !DIEnumerator(name: "SixKind", value: 7)
     !1 = !DIEnumerator(name: "SevenKind", value: 7)
@@ -4100,7 +4100,7 @@ field, even if the nodes are ``distinct``.
 
 The following ``tag:`` values are valid:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   DW_TAG_array_type       = 1
   DW_TAG_class_type       = 2
@@ -4219,7 +4219,7 @@ type with an ODR ``identifier:`` and that does not set ``flags: DIFwdDecl``,
 then the subprogram declaration is uniqued based only on its ``linkageName:``
 and ``scope:``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     define void @_Z3foov() !dbg !0 {
       ...
@@ -4244,7 +4244,7 @@ DILexicalBlock
 two lexical blocks at same depth. They are valid targets for ``scope:``
 fields.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !1, file: !2, line: 7, column: 35)
 
@@ -4290,7 +4290,7 @@ the ``arg:`` field is set to non-zero, then this variable is a subprogram
 parameter, and it will be included in the ``variables:`` field of its
 :ref:`DISubprogram`.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = !DILocalVariable(name: "this", arg: 1, scope: !3, file: !2, line: 7,
                           type: !3, flags: DIFlagArtificial)
@@ -4313,7 +4313,7 @@ The current supported vocabulary is limited:
 - ``DW_OP_bit_piece, 16, 8`` specifies the offset and size (``16`` and ``8``
   here, respectively) of the variable piece from the working expression.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     !0 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref)
     !1 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 3)
@@ -4336,7 +4336,7 @@ DIImportedEntity
 ``DIImportedEntity`` nodes represent entities (such as modules) imported into a
 compile unit.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    !2 = !DIImportedEntity(tag: DW_TAG_imported_module, name: "foo", scope: !0,
                           entity: !1, line: 7)
@@ -4349,7 +4349,7 @@ The ``name:`` field is the macro identifier, followed by macro parameters when
 defining a function-like macro, and the ``value`` field is the token-string
 used to expand the macro identifier.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    !2 = !DIMacro(macinfo: DW_MACINFO_define, line: 7, name: "foo(x)",
                  value: "((x) + 1)")
@@ -4362,7 +4362,7 @@ DIMacroFile
 The ``nodes:`` field is a list of ``DIMacro`` and ``DIMacroFile`` nodes that
 appear in the included source file.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    !2 = !DIMacroFile(macinfo: DW_MACINFO_start_file, line: 7, file: !2,
                      nodes: !3)
@@ -5660,7 +5660,7 @@ block. Therefore, it must be the only non-phi instruction in the block.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     dispatch1:
       %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %handler0, label %handler1] unwind to caller
@@ -5711,7 +5711,7 @@ the ``catchret``'s behavior is undefined.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       catchret from %catch label %continue
 
@@ -5761,7 +5761,7 @@ It transfers control to ``continue`` or unwinds out of the function.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       cleanupret from %cleanup unwind to caller
       cleanupret from %cleanup unwind label %continue
@@ -5851,7 +5851,7 @@ unsigned and/or signed overflow, respectively, occurs.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = add i32 4, %var          ; yields i32:result = 4 + %var
 
@@ -5890,7 +5890,7 @@ optimizations:
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = fadd float 4.0, %var          ; yields float:result = 4.0 + %var
 
@@ -5942,7 +5942,7 @@ unsigned and/or signed overflow, respectively, occurs.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = sub i32 4, %var          ; yields i32:result = 4 - %var
       <result> = sub i32 0, %val          ; yields i32:result = -%var
@@ -5985,7 +5985,7 @@ unsafe floating point optimizations:
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = fsub float 4.0, %var           ; yields float:result = 4.0 - %var
       <result> = fsub float -0.0, %val          ; yields float:result = -%var
@@ -6039,7 +6039,7 @@ unsigned and/or signed overflow, respectively, occurs.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = mul i32 4, %var          ; yields i32:result = 4 * %var
 
@@ -6078,7 +6078,7 @@ unsafe floating point optimizations:
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = fmul float 4.0, %var          ; yields float:result = 4.0 * %var
 
@@ -6122,7 +6122,7 @@ such, "((a udiv exact b) mul b) == a").
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = udiv i32 4, %var          ; yields i32:result = 4 / %var
 
@@ -6168,7 +6168,7 @@ a :ref:`poison value <poisonvalues>` if the result would be rounded.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = sdiv i32 4, %var          ; yields i32:result = 4 / %var
 
@@ -6207,7 +6207,7 @@ unsafe floating point optimizations:
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = fdiv float 4.0, %var          ; yields float:result = 4.0 / %var
 
@@ -6249,7 +6249,7 @@ Taking the remainder of a division by zero leads to undefined behavior.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = urem i32 4, %var          ; yields i32:result = 4 % %var
 
@@ -6304,7 +6304,7 @@ result of the division and the remainder.)
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = srem i32 4, %var          ; yields i32:result = 4 % %var
 
@@ -6344,7 +6344,7 @@ to enable otherwise unsafe floating point optimizations:
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = frem float 4.0, %var          ; yields float:result = 4.0 % %var
 
@@ -6406,7 +6406,7 @@ nsw/nuw bits in (mul %op1, (shl 1, %op2)).
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = shl i32 4, %var   ; yields i32: 4 << %var
       <result> = shl i32 4, 2      ; yields i32: 16
@@ -6455,7 +6455,7 @@ non-zero.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = lshr i32 4, 1   ; yields i32:result = 2
       <result> = lshr i32 4, 2   ; yields i32:result = 1
@@ -6506,7 +6506,7 @@ non-zero.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = ashr i32 4, 1   ; yields i32:result = 2
       <result> = ashr i32 4, 2   ; yields i32:result = 1
@@ -6558,7 +6558,7 @@ The truth table used for the '``and``' instruction is:
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = and i32 4, %var         ; yields i32:result = 4 & %var
       <result> = and i32 15, 40          ; yields i32:result = 8
@@ -6657,7 +6657,7 @@ The truth table used for the '``xor``' instruction is:
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = xor i32 4, %var         ; yields i32:result = 4 ^ %var
       <result> = xor i32 15, 40          ; yields i32:result = 39
@@ -6710,7 +6710,7 @@ exceeds the length of ``val``, the results are undefined.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = extractelement <4 x i32> %vec, i32 0    ; yields i32
 
@@ -6752,7 +6752,7 @@ undefined.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = insertelement <4 x i32> %vec, i32 1, i32 0    ; yields <4 x i32>
 
@@ -6800,7 +6800,7 @@ only one vector.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = shufflevector <4 x i32> %v1, <4 x i32> %v2,
                               <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 4, i32 1, i32 5>  ; yields <4 x i32>
@@ -6859,7 +6859,7 @@ the index operands.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = extractvalue {i32, float} %agg, 0    ; yields i32
 
@@ -8126,7 +8126,7 @@ or :ref:`ptrtoint <i_ptrtoint>` instructions first.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       %X = bitcast i8 255 to i8              ; yields i8 :-1
       %Y = bitcast i32* %x to sint*          ; yields sint*:%x
@@ -8265,7 +8265,7 @@ as the values being compared. Otherwise, the result is an ``i1``.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = icmp eq i32 4, 5          ; yields: result=false
       <result> = icmp ne float* %X, %X     ; yields: result=false
@@ -8379,7 +8379,7 @@ assumptions to be made about the values of input arguments; namely
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       <result> = fcmp oeq float 4.0, 5.0    ; yields: result=false
       <result> = fcmp one float 4.0, 5.0    ; yields: result=true
@@ -8815,7 +8815,7 @@ that does not carry an appropriate :ref:`"funclet" bundle <ob_funclet>`.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     dispatch:
       %cs = catchswitch within none [label %handler0] unwind to caller
@@ -8885,7 +8885,7 @@ that does not carry an appropriate :ref:`"funclet" bundle <ob_funclet>`.
 Example:
 """"""""
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
       %tok = cleanuppad within %cs []
 
@@ -12481,19 +12481,19 @@ optimistic assumptions made during compilation.  The semantics of
 ``@llvm.experimental.deoptimize`` -- its body is defined to be
 equivalent to:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
-	define void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %pred, <args...>) {
-	  %realPred = and i1 %pred, undef
-	  br i1 %realPred, label %continue, label %leave [, !make.implicit !{}]
+  define void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %pred, <args...>) {
+    %realPred = and i1 %pred, undef
+    br i1 %realPred, label %continue, label %leave [, !make.implicit !{}]
 
-	leave:
-	  call void @llvm.experimental.deoptimize(<args...>) [ "deopt"() ]
-	  ret void
+  leave:
+    call void @llvm.experimental.deoptimize(<args...>) [ "deopt"() ]
+    ret void
 
-	continue:
-	  ret void
-	}
+  continue:
+    ret void
+  }
 
 
 with the optional ``[, !make.implicit !{}]`` present if and only if it

docs/MIRLangRef.rst

@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ Here is an example of a YAML document that contains an LLVM module:
 
 .. code-block:: llvm
 
-     --- |
        define i32 @inc(i32* %x) {
        entry:
          %0 = load i32, i32* %x
@@ -119,7 +118,6 @@ Here is an example of a YAML document that contains an LLVM module:
          store i32 %1, i32* %x
          ret i32 %1
        }
-     ...
 
 .. _YAML block literal string: http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2795688
 
@@ -129,7 +127,7 @@ Machine Functions
 The remaining YAML documents contain the machine functions. This is an example
 of such YAML document:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
      ---
      name:            inc
@@ -172,7 +170,7 @@ A machine basic block is defined in a single block definition source construct
 that contains the block's ID.
 The example below defines two blocks that have an ID of zero and one:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     bb.0:
       <instructions>
@@ -182,7 +180,7 @@ The example below defines two blocks that have an ID of zero and one:
 A machine basic block can also have a name. It should be specified after the ID
 in the block's definition:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     bb.0.entry:       ; This block's name is "entry"
        <instructions>
@@ -196,7 +194,7 @@ Block References
 The machine basic blocks are identified by their ID numbers. Individual
 blocks are referenced using the following syntax:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %bb.<id>[.<name>]
 
@@ -213,7 +211,7 @@ Successors
 The machine basic block's successors have to be specified before any of the
 instructions:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     bb.0.entry:
       successors: %bb.1.then, %bb.2.else
@@ -227,7 +225,7 @@ The branch weights can be specified in brackets after the successor blocks.
 The example below defines a block that has two successors with branch weights
 of 32 and 16:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     bb.0.entry:
       successors: %bb.1.then(32), %bb.2.else(16)
@@ -240,7 +238,7 @@ Live In Registers
 The machine basic block's live in registers have to be specified before any of
 the instructions:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     bb.0.entry:
       liveins: %edi, %esi
@@ -255,7 +253,7 @@ Miscellaneous Attributes
 The attributes ``IsAddressTaken``, ``IsLandingPad`` and ``Alignment`` can be
 specified in brackets after the block's definition:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     bb.0.entry (address-taken):
       <instructions>
@@ -278,7 +276,7 @@ The instruction's name is usually specified before the operands. The example
 below shows an instance of the X86 ``RETQ`` instruction with a single machine
 operand:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     RETQ %eax
 
@@ -287,7 +285,7 @@ operands, the instruction's name has to be specified after them. The example
 below shows an instance of the AArch64 ``LDPXpost`` instruction with three
 defined register operands:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %sp, %fp, %lr = LDPXpost %sp, 2
 
@@ -303,7 +301,7 @@ Instruction Flags
 
 The flag ``frame-setup`` can be specified before the instruction's name:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %fp = frame-setup ADDXri %sp, 0, 0
 
@@ -321,13 +319,13 @@ but they can also be used in a number of other places, like the
 The physical registers are identified by their name. They use the following
 syntax:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %<name>
 
 The example below shows three X86 physical registers:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %eax
     %r15
@@ -336,13 +334,13 @@ The example below shows three X86 physical registers:
 The virtual registers are identified by their ID number. They use the following
 syntax:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %<id>
 
 Example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %0
 
@@ -366,7 +364,7 @@ The immediate machine operands are untyped, 64-bit signed integers. The
 example below shows an instance of the X86 ``MOV32ri`` instruction that has an
 immediate machine operand ``-42``:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %eax = MOV32ri -42
 
@@ -384,14 +382,14 @@ machine operands. The register operands can also have optional
 and a reference to the tied register operand.
 The full syntax of a register operand is shown below:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     [<flags>] <register> [ :<subregister-idx-name> ] [ (tied-def <tied-op>) ]
 
 This example shows an instance of the X86 ``XOR32rr`` instruction that has
 5 register operands with different register flags:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   dead %eax = XOR32rr undef %eax, undef %eax, implicit-def dead %eflags, implicit-def %al
 
@@ -446,7 +444,7 @@ the subregister indices. The example below shows an instance of the ``COPY``
 pseudo instruction that uses the X86 ``sub_8bit`` subregister index to copy 8
 lower bits from the 32-bit virtual register 0 to the 8-bit virtual register 1:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %1 = COPY %0:sub_8bit
 
@@ -461,7 +459,7 @@ The global value machine operands reference the global values from the
 The example below shows an instance of the X86 ``MOV64rm`` instruction that has
 a global value operand named ``G``:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     %rax = MOV64rm %rip, 1, _, @G, _
 

docs/MarkedUpDisassembly.rst

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ clients.
 For example, a possible annotation of an ARM load of a stack-relative location
 might be annotated as:
 
-.. code-block:: nasm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    ldr <reg gpr:r0>, <mem regoffset:[<reg gpr:sp>, <imm:#4>]>
 

docs/MergeFunctions.rst

@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ and in right function "*FR*". And every part of *left* place is equal to the
 corresponding part of *right* place, and (!) both parts use *Value* instances,
 for example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    instr0 i32 %LV   ; left side, function FL
    instr0 i32 %RV   ; right side, function FR
@@ -409,13 +409,13 @@ in "*FL*" and "*FR*".
 
 Consider small example here:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define void %f(i32 %pf0, i32 %pf1) {
     instr0 i32 %pf0 instr1 i32 %pf1 instr2 i32 123
   }
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define void %g(i32 %pg0, i32 %pg1) {
     instr0 i32 %pg0 instr1 i32 %pg0 instr2 i32 123

docs/NVPTXUsage.rst

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ code. By default, the back-end will emit device functions. Metadata is used to
 declare a function as a kernel function. This metadata is attached to the
 ``nvvm.annotations`` named metadata object, and has the following format:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
    !0 = !{<function-ref>, metadata !"kernel", i32 1}
 

docs/SegmentedStacks.rst

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ current stack limit (minus the amount of space needed to allocate a new block) -
 this slot's offset is again dictated by ``libgcc``. The generated
 assembly looks like this on x86-64:
 
-.. code-block:: nasm
+.. code-block:: text
 
     leaq     -8(%rsp), %r10
     cmpq     %fs:112,  %r10

docs/SourceLevelDebugging.rst

@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ following C fragment, for example:
 
 Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
   define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 {
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ The first intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for the
 variable ``X``.  The metadata ``!dbg !14`` attached to the intrinsic provides
 scope information for the variable ``X``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4)
   !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5,
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ The third intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for
 variable ``Z``.  The metadata ``!dbg !19`` attached to the intrinsic provides
 scope information for the variable ``Z``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5)
   !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18)
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ Given an integer global variable declared as follows:
 
 a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ;;
   ;; Define the global itself.
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ Given a function declared as follows:
 
 a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ;;
   ;; Define the anchor for subprograms.

docs/Statepoints.rst

@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ SSA value ``%obj.relocated`` which represents the potentially changed value of
 ``%obj`` after the safepoint and update any following uses appropriately.  The 
 resulting relocation sequence is:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 
          gc "statepoint-example" {
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ afterwards.
 If we extend our previous example to include a pointless derived pointer, 
 we get:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 
          gc "statepoint-example" {
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ Let's assume a hypothetical GC--somewhat unimaginatively named "hypothetical-gc"
 --that requires that a TLS variable must be written to before and after a call
 to unmanaged code. The resulting relocation sequence is:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   @flag = thread_local global i32 0, align 4
 
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ distinguish between GC references and non-GC references in IR it is given.
 
 As an example, given this code:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 
          gc "statepoint-example" {
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ As an example, given this code:
 
 The pass would produce this IR:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 
          gc "statepoint-example" {
@@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ As an example, given input IR of the following:
 
 This pass would produce the following IR:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   define void @test() gc "statepoint-example" {
     %safepoint_token = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @do_safepoint, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)

docs/TableGen/LangIntro.rst

@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ the record ends with a semicolon.
 
 Here is a simple TableGen file:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class C { bit V = 1; }
   def X : C;
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ derived class or definition wants to override.  Let expressions consist of the
 value.  For example, a new class could be added to the example above, redefining
 the ``V`` field for all of its subclasses:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class D : C { let V = 0; }
   def Z : D;
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ concrete classes.  Parameterized TableGen classes specify a list of variable
 bindings (which may optionally have defaults) that are bound when used.  Here is
 a simple example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class FPFormat<bits<3> val> {
     bits<3> Value = val;
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ integer.
 The more esoteric forms of `TableGen expressions`_ are useful in conjunction
 with template arguments.  As an example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class ModRefVal<bits<2> val> {
     bits<2> Value = val;
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ be used to decouple the interface provided to the user of the class from the
 actual internal data representation expected by the class.  In this case,
 running ``llvm-tblgen`` on the example prints the following definitions:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def bork {      // Value
     bit isMod = 1;
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ commonality exists, then in a separate place indicate what all the ops are.
 
 Here is an example TableGen fragment that shows this idea:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def ops;
   def GPR;
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ inherit from multiple multiclasses, instantiating definitions from each
 multiclass.  Using a multiclass this way is exactly equivalent to instantiating
 the classes multiple times yourself, e.g. by writing:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def ops;
   def GPR;
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ the classes multiple times yourself, e.g. by writing:
 A ``defm`` can also be used inside a multiclass providing several levels of
 multiclass instantiations.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class Instruction<bits<4> opc, string Name> {
     bits<4> opcode = opc;
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ multiclass instantiations.
 the class list must start after the last multiclass, and there must be at least
 one multiclass before them.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class XD { bits<4> Prefix = 11; }
   class XS { bits<4> Prefix = 12; }
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ specified file in place of the include directive.  The filename should be
 specified as a double quoted string immediately after the '``include``' keyword.
 Example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   include "foo.td"
 
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ commonality from the records.
 File-scope "let" expressions take a comma-separated list of bindings to apply,
 and one or more records to bind the values in.  Here are some examples:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   let isTerminator = 1, isReturn = 1, isBarrier = 1, hasCtrlDep = 1 in
     def RET : I<0xC3, RawFrm, (outs), (ins), "ret", [(X86retflag 0)]>;
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ ways to factor out commonality from the records, specially if using several
 levels of multiclass instantiations. This also avoids the need of using "let"
 expressions within subsequent records inside a multiclass.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   multiclass basic_r<bits<4> opc> {
     let Predicates = [HasSSE2] in {
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ TableGen supports the '``foreach``' block, which textually replicates the loop
 body, substituting iterator values for iterator references in the body.
 Example:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   foreach i = [0, 1, 2, 3] in {
     def R#i : Register<...>;
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ This will create objects ``R0``, ``R1``, ``R2`` and ``R3``.  ``foreach`` blocks
 may be nested. If there is only one item in the body the braces may be
 elided:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   foreach i = [0, 1, 2, 3] in
     def R#i : Register<...>;

docs/TableGen/index.rst

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ of the classes, then all of the definitions.  This is a good way to see what the
 various definitions expand to fully.  Running this on the ``X86.td`` file prints
 this (at the time of this writing):
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   ...
   def ADD32rr {   // Instruction X86Inst I
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ by the code generator, and specifying it all manually would be unmaintainable,
 prone to bugs, and tiring to do in the first place.  Because we are using
 TableGen, all of the information was derived from the following definition:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   let Defs = [EFLAGS],
       isCommutable = 1,                  // X = ADD Y,Z --> X = ADD Z,Y
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ TableGen.
 **TableGen definitions** are the concrete form of 'records'.  These generally do
 not have any undefined values, and are marked with the '``def``' keyword.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def FeatureFPARMv8 : SubtargetFeature<"fp-armv8", "HasFPARMv8", "true",
                                         "Enable ARMv8 FP">;
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ floating point instructions in the X86 backend).  TableGen keeps track of all of
 the classes that are used to build up a definition, so the backend can find all
 definitions of a particular class, such as "Instruction".
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
  class ProcNoItin<string Name, list<SubtargetFeature> Features>
        : Processor<Name, NoItineraries, Features>;
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ If a multiclass inherits from another multiclass, the definitions in the
 sub-multiclass become part of the current multiclass, as if they were declared
 in the current multiclass.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   multiclass ro_signed_pats<string T, string Rm, dag Base, dag Offset, dag Extend,
                           dag address, ValueType sty> {

docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.rst

@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ to define an object for each register.  The specified string ``n`` becomes the
 ``Name`` of the register.  The basic ``Register`` object does not have any
 subregisters and does not specify any aliases.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class Register<string n> {
     string Namespace = "";
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ subregisters and does not specify any aliases.
 For example, in the ``X86RegisterInfo.td`` file, there are register definitions
 that utilize the ``Register`` class, such as:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def AL : Register<"AL">, DwarfRegNum<[0, 0, 0]>;
 
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ classes.  In ``Target.td``, the ``Register`` class is the base for the
 ``RegisterWithSubRegs`` class that is used to define registers that need to
 specify subregisters in the ``SubRegs`` list, as shown here:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class RegisterWithSubRegs<string n, list<Register> subregs> : Register<n> {
     let SubRegs = subregs;
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ feature common to these subclasses.  Note the use of "``let``" expressions to
 override values that are initially defined in a superclass (such as ``SubRegs``
 field in the ``Rd`` class).
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class SparcReg<string n> : Register<n> {
     field bits<5> Num;
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ field in the ``Rd`` class).
 In the ``SparcRegisterInfo.td`` file, there are register definitions that
 utilize these subclasses of ``Register``, such as:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def G0 : Ri< 0, "G0">, DwarfRegNum<[0]>;
   def G1 : Ri< 1, "G1">, DwarfRegNum<[1]>;
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ default allocation order of the registers.  A target description file
 ``XXXRegisterInfo.td`` that uses ``Target.td`` can construct register classes
 using the following class:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class RegisterClass<string namespace,
   list<ValueType> regTypes, int alignment, dag regList> {
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ defines a group of 32 single-precision floating-point registers (``F0`` to
 ``F31``); ``DFPRegs`` defines a group of 16 double-precision registers
 (``D0-D15``).
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   // F0, F1, F2, ..., F31
   def FPRegs : RegisterClass<"SP", [f32], 32, (sequence "F%u", 0, 31)>;
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ which describes one instruction.  An instruction descriptor defines:
 The Instruction class (defined in ``Target.td``) is mostly used as a base for
 more complex instruction classes.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class Instruction {
     string Namespace = "";
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ specific operation value for ``LD``/Load Word.  The third parameter is the
 output destination, which is a register operand and defined in the ``Register``
 target description file (``IntRegs``).
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def LDrr : F3_1 <3, 0b000000, (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins MEMrr:$addr),
                    "ld [$addr], $dst",
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ target description file (``IntRegs``).
 The fourth parameter is the input source, which uses the address operand
 ``MEMrr`` that is defined earlier in ``SparcInstrInfo.td``:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def MEMrr : Operand<i32> {
     let PrintMethod = "printMemOperand";
@@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ immediate value operands.  For example, to perform a Load Integer instruction
 for a Word from an immediate operand to a register, the following instruction
 class is defined:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def LDri : F3_2 <3, 0b000000, (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins MEMri:$addr),
                    "ld [$addr], $dst",
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ creation of templates to define several instruction classes at once (using the
 pattern ``F3_12`` is defined to create 2 instruction classes each time
 ``F3_12`` is invoked:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   multiclass F3_12 <string OpcStr, bits<6> Op3Val, SDNode OpNode> {
     def rr  : F3_1 <2, Op3Val,
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ So when the ``defm`` directive is used for the ``XOR`` and ``ADD``
 instructions, as seen below, it creates four instruction objects: ``XORrr``,
 ``XORri``, ``ADDrr``, and ``ADDri``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   defm XOR   : F3_12<"xor", 0b000011, xor>;
   defm ADD   : F3_12<"add", 0b000000, add>;
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ For example, the 10\ :sup:`th` bit represents the "greater than" condition for
 integers, and the 22\ :sup:`nd` bit represents the "greater than" condition for
 floats.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def ICC_NE  : ICC_VAL< 9>;  // Not Equal
   def ICC_E   : ICC_VAL< 1>;  // Equal
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ order they are defined.  Fields are bound when they are assigned a value.  For
 example, the Sparc target defines the ``XNORrr`` instruction as a ``F3_1``
 format instruction having three operands.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def XNORrr  : F3_1<2, 0b000111,
                      (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins IntRegs:$b, IntRegs:$c),
@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ format instruction having three operands.
 The instruction templates in ``SparcInstrFormats.td`` show the base class for
 ``F3_1`` is ``InstSP``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class InstSP<dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern> : Instruction {
     field bits<32> Inst;
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ The instruction templates in ``SparcInstrFormats.td`` show the base class for
 
 ``InstSP`` leaves the ``op`` field unbound.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class F3<dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern>
       : InstSP<outs, ins, asmstr, pattern> {
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ The instruction templates in ``SparcInstrFormats.td`` show the base class for
 fields.  ``F3`` format instructions will bind the operands ``rd``, ``op3``, and
 ``rs1`` fields.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class F3_1<bits<2> opVal, bits<6> op3val, dag outs, dag ins,
              string asmstr, list<dag> pattern> : F3<outs, ins, asmstr, pattern> {
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ TableGen definition will add all of its operands to an enumeration in the
 llvm::XXX:OpName namespace and also add an entry for it into the OperandMap
 table, which can be queried using getNamedOperandIdx()
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   int DstIndex = SP::getNamedOperandIdx(SP::XNORrr, SP::OpName::dst); // => 0
   int BIndex = SP::getNamedOperandIdx(SP::XNORrr, SP::OpName::b);     // => 1
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ For example, the X86 backend defines ``brtarget`` and ``brtarget8``, both
 instances of the TableGen ``Operand`` class, which represent branch target
 operands:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def brtarget : Operand<OtherVT>;
   def brtarget8 : Operand<OtherVT>;
@@ -1222,14 +1222,14 @@ definitions in ``XXXInstrInfo.td``.  For example, in ``SparcInstrInfo.td``,
 this entry defines a register store operation, and the last parameter describes
 a pattern with the store DAG operator.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def STrr  : F3_1< 3, 0b000100, (outs), (ins MEMrr:$addr, IntRegs:$src),
                    "st $src, [$addr]", [(store i32:$src, ADDRrr:$addr)]>;
 
 ``ADDRrr`` is a memory mode that is also defined in ``SparcInstrInfo.td``:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def ADDRrr : ComplexPattern<i32, 2, "SelectADDRrr", [], []>;
 
@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ defined in an implementation of the Instructor Selector (such as
 In ``lib/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td``, the DAG operator for store is defined
 below:
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def store : PatFrag<(ops node:$val, node:$ptr),
                       (st node:$val, node:$ptr), [{
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ if the current argument is of type ``f32`` or ``f64``), then the action is
 performed.  In this case, the ``CCAssignToReg`` action assigns the argument
 value to the first available register: either ``R0`` or ``R1``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   CCIfType<[f32,f64], CCAssignToReg<[R0, R1]>>
 
@@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@ which registers are used for specified scalar return types.  A single-precision
 float is returned to register ``F0``, and a double-precision float goes to
 register ``D0``.  A 32-bit integer is returned in register ``I0`` or ``I1``.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def RetCC_Sparc32 : CallingConv<[
     CCIfType<[i32], CCAssignToReg<[I0, I1]>>,
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ the size of the slot, and the second parameter, also 4, indicates the stack
 alignment along 4-byte units.  (Special cases: if size is zero, then the ABI
 size is used; if alignment is zero, then the ABI alignment is used.)
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def CC_Sparc32 : CallingConv<[
     // All arguments get passed in integer registers if there is space.
@@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ the following example (in ``X86CallingConv.td``), the definition of
 assigned to the register ``ST0`` or ``ST1``, the ``RetCC_X86Common`` is
 invoked.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def RetCC_X86_32_C : CallingConv<[
     CCIfType<[f32], CCAssignToReg<[ST0, ST1]>>,
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ then a specified action is invoked.  In the following example (in
 ``RetCC_X86_32_Fast`` is invoked.  If the ``SSECall`` calling convention is in
 use, then ``RetCC_X86_32_SSE`` is invoked.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def RetCC_X86_32 : CallingConv<[
     CCIfCC<"CallingConv::Fast", CCDelegateTo<RetCC_X86_32_Fast>>,
@@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ feature, the value of the attribute, and a description of the feature.  (The
 fifth parameter is a list of features whose presence is implied, and its
 default value is an empty array.)
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class SubtargetFeature<string n, string a, string v, string d,
                          list<SubtargetFeature> i = []> {
@@ -1696,7 +1696,7 @@ default value is an empty array.)
 In the ``Sparc.td`` file, the ``SubtargetFeature`` is used to define the
 following features.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   def FeatureV9 : SubtargetFeature<"v9", "IsV9", "true",
                        "Enable SPARC-V9 instructions">;
@@ -1710,7 +1710,7 @@ Elsewhere in ``Sparc.td``, the ``Proc`` class is defined and then is used to
 define particular SPARC processor subtypes that may have the previously
 described features.
 
-.. code-block:: llvm
+.. code-block:: text
 
   class Proc<string Name, list<SubtargetFeature> Features>
     : Processor<Name, NoItineraries, Features>;

docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.rst

@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ template parameter is the name of the pass that is to be used on the command
 line to specify that the pass should be added to a program (for example, with
 :program:`opt` or :program:`bugpoint`).  The first argument is the name of the
 pass, which is to be used for the :option:`-help` output of programs, as well
-as for debug output generated by the :option:`--debug-pass` option.
+as for debug output generated by the `--debug-pass` option.
 
 If you want your pass to be easily dumpable, you should implement the virtual
 print method: