123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193 |
- =====================================
- Cross Translation Unit (CTU) Analysis
- =====================================
- Normally, static analysis works in the boundary of one translation unit (TU).
- However, with additional steps and configuration we can enable the analysis to inline the definition of a function from another TU.
- .. contents::
- :local:
- Manual CTU Analysis
- -------------------
- Let's consider these source files in our minimal example:
- .. code-block:: cpp
- // main.cpp
- int foo();
- int main() {
- return 3 / foo();
- }
- .. code-block:: cpp
- // foo.cpp
- int foo() {
- return 0;
- }
- And a compilation database:
- .. code-block:: bash
- [
- {
- "directory": "/path/to/your/project",
- "command": "clang++ -c foo.cpp -o foo.o",
- "file": "foo.cpp"
- },
- {
- "directory": "/path/to/your/project",
- "command": "clang++ -c main.cpp -o main.o",
- "file": "main.cpp"
- }
- ]
- We'd like to analyze `main.cpp` and discover the division by zero bug.
- In order to be able to inline the definition of `foo` from `foo.cpp` first we have to generate the `AST` (or `PCH`) file of `foo.cpp`:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ pwd $ /path/to/your/project
- $ clang++ -emit-ast -o foo.cpp.ast foo.cpp
- $ # Check that the .ast file is generated:
- $ ls
- compile_commands.json foo.cpp.ast foo.cpp main.cpp
- $
- The next step is to create a CTU index file which holds the `USR` name and location of external definitions in the source files:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ clang-extdef-mapping -p . foo.cpp
- c:@F@foo# /path/to/your/project/foo.cpp
- $ clang-extdef-mapping -p . foo.cpp > externalDefMap.txt
- We have to modify `externalDefMap.txt` to contain the name of the `.ast` files instead of the source files:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ sed -i -e "s/.cpp/.cpp.ast/g" externalDefMap.txt
- We still have to further modify the `externalDefMap.txt` file to contain relative paths:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ sed -i -e "s|$(pwd)/||g" externalDefMap.txt
- Now everything is available for the CTU analysis.
- We have to feed Clang with CTU specific extra arguments:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ pwd
- /path/to/your/project
- $ clang++ --analyze -Xclang -analyzer-config -Xclang experimental-enable-naive-ctu-analysis=true -Xclang -analyzer-config -Xclang ctu-dir=. -Xclang -analyzer-output=plist-multi-file main.cpp
- main.cpp:5:12: warning: Division by zero
- return 3 / foo();
- ~~^~~~~~~
- 1 warning generated.
- $ # The plist file with the result is generated.
- $ ls
- compile_commands.json externalDefMap.txt foo.ast foo.cpp foo.cpp.ast main.cpp main.plist
- $
- This manual procedure is error-prone and not scalable, therefore to analyze real projects it is recommended to use `CodeChecker` or `scan-build-py`.
- Automated CTU Analysis with CodeChecker
- ---------------------------------------
- The `CodeChecker <https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker>`_ project fully supports automated CTU analysis with Clang.
- Once we have set up the `PATH` environment variable and we activated the python `venv` then it is all it takes:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ CodeChecker analyze --ctu compile_commands.json -o reports
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Pre-analysis started.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Collecting data for ctu analysis.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - [1/2] foo.cpp
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - [2/2] main.cpp
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Pre-analysis finished.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Starting static analysis ...
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - [1/2] clangsa analyzed foo.cpp successfully.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - [2/2] clangsa analyzed main.cpp successfully.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - ----==== Summary ====----
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Successfully analyzed
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - clangsa: 2
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Total analyzed compilation commands: 2
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - ----=================----
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Analysis finished.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - To view results in the terminal use the "CodeChecker parse" command.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - To store results use the "CodeChecker store" command.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - See --help and the user guide for further options about parsing and storing the reports.
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - ----=================----
- [INFO 2019-07-16 17:21] - Analysis length: 0.659618854523 sec.
- $ ls
- compile_commands.json foo.cpp foo.cpp.ast main.cpp reports
- $ tree reports
- reports
- ├── compile_cmd.json
- ├── compiler_info.json
- ├── foo.cpp_53f6fbf7ab7ec9931301524b551959e2.plist
- ├── main.cpp_23db3d8df52ff0812e6e5a03071c8337.plist
- ├── metadata.json
- └── unique_compile_commands.json
- 0 directories, 6 files
- $
- The `plist` files contain the results of the analysis, which may be viewed with the regular analysis tools.
- E.g. one may use `CodeChecker parse` to view the results in command line:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ CodeChecker parse reports
- [HIGH] /home/egbomrt/ctu_mini_raw_project/main.cpp:5:12: Division by zero [core.DivideZero]
- return 3 / foo();
- ^
- Found 1 defect(s) in main.cpp
- ----==== Summary ====----
- -----------------------
- Filename | Report count
- -----------------------
- main.cpp | 1
- -----------------------
- -----------------------
- Severity | Report count
- -----------------------
- HIGH | 1
- -----------------------
- ----=================----
- Total number of reports: 1
- ----=================----
- Or we can use `CodeChecker parse -e html` to export the results into HTML format:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ CodeChecker parse -e html -o html_out reports
- $ firefox html_out/index.html
- Automated CTU Analysis with scan-build-py (don't do it)
- -------------------------------------------------------
- We actively develop CTU with CodeChecker as a "runner" script, `scan-build-py` is not actively developed for CTU.
- `scan-build-py` has various errors and issues, expect it to work with the very basic projects only.
- Example usage of scan-build-py:
- .. code-block:: bash
- $ /your/path/to/llvm-project/clang/tools/scan-build-py/bin/analyze-build --ctu
- analyze-build: Run 'scan-view /tmp/scan-build-2019-07-17-17-53-33-810365-7fqgWk' to examine bug reports.
- $ /your/path/to/llvm-project/clang/tools/scan-view/bin/scan-view /tmp/scan-build-2019-07-17-17-53-33-810365-7fqgWk
- Starting scan-view at: http://127.0.0.1:8181
- Use Ctrl-C to exit.
- [6336:6431:0717/175357.633914:ERROR:browser_process_sub_thread.cc(209)] Waited 5 ms for network service
- Opening in existing browser session.
- ^C
- $
|